-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 202
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix #2297, Create Workflow for IC Bundle Generation #2298
Conversation
…pushing them to the integration-candidate branch.
a64c36e
to
a2d9852
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks OK, but I'd like to discuss the possibility of naming the IC branch using a date-based scheme, e.g.ic-YYYYMMDD
instead of always calling it integration-candidate
.
Once the testing of the IC is done, the branch is simply deleted (this can be because it was merged to main or something broke and we abandon it).
IMO having unique branch names for each IC makes things more manageable. Is there a reason we need to keep the name the same?
I think we should consider using the date scheme. The process that I inherited was to use a single integration-candidate branch, so I want to get team concurrence before I change it. |
CCB 20 April 2023: Configure shell to trigger BASH to exit if something goes wrong in run block. Split run blocks where possible. |
*Combines:* cFE v7.0.0-rc4+dev276 osal v6.0.0-rc4+dev213 PSP v1.6.0-rc4+dev76 **Includes:** *cFE* - nasa/cFE#2299 - nasa/cFE#2300 - nasa/cFE#2298 *osal* - nasa/osal#1383 *PSP* - nasa/PSP#391 Co-authored by: Joseph Hickey <jphickey@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored by: Dylan Z. Baker <dzbaker@users.noreply.github.com>
*Combines:* cFE v7.0.0-rc4+dev276 osal v6.0.0-rc4+dev213 PSP v1.6.0-rc4+dev76 **Includes:** *cFE* - nasa/cFE#2299 - nasa/cFE#2300 - nasa/cFE#2298 *osal* - nasa/osal#1383 *PSP* - nasa/PSP#391 Co-authored by: Joseph Hickey <jphickey@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored by: Dylan Z. Baker <dzbaker@users.noreply.github.com>
Checklist (Please check before submitting)
Describe the contribution
A clear and concise description of what the contribution is.
Testing performed
Generated IC branch in fork.
Expected behavior changes
Adds new workflow for integration candidate branch generation.
Contributor Info - All information REQUIRED for consideration of pull request
Dylan Z. Baker/NASA GSFC 582